I had the 2 convos anyways, I just didn't post the

[Abrams]

m.

Session Start (spies4Abrams:spies4Candy): Sun Nov 11 21:39:53 2007
[21:39] spies4Abrams: Invite me again.
[21:40] spies4Candy: OK
[21:40] spies4Abrams: Ok, I dunno what the hell is wrong.
[21:41] spies4Abrams: One more time.
[21:41] spies4Candy: OK no problem
[21:43] spies4Abrams: Again, please.
[21:44] spies4Candy: You using the latest version of AIM?
[21:44] spies4Abrams: Trillian
[21:44] spies4Candy: Hmm
[21:44] spies4Candy: OK
[21:44] spies4Candy: Sent
[21:45] spies4Abrams: "General error when attempting service redirection on service 6"
[21:45] spies4Abrams: That's what I'm getting.
[21:45] spies4Candy: Hmm
[21:45] spies4Abrams: Never midn.
Session Close (spies4Candy): Sun Nov 11 21:45:42 2007


Session Start (spies4Abrams:spies4Kip): Sun Nov 11 23:27:16 2007
[23:27] spies4Kip: hello abrams
[23:27] spies4Abrams: Hola
[23:27] spies4Kip: i dont think ive spoken to you at all yet
[23:28] spies4Kip: how are you?
[23:28] spies4Abrams: Good.
[23:28] spies4Kip: same here i guess, as good as can be after exiling a cit
[23:29] spies4Abrams: Right.
[23:29] spies4Abrams: Well, get used to it.
[23:29] spies4Kip: heh
[23:29] spies4Kip: happens a lot i see
[23:29] spies4Abrams: Yup.
[01:02] *** "spies4Kip" signed off at Mon Nov 12 01:02:14 2007.
[13:10] *** "spies4Kip" signed on at Mon Nov 12 13:10:03 2007.

I talked to people, that bull that I didn't. You've gotta believe me, I didn't know.

[Judge Sam]

Hey Nick-


I appreciate you being very calm and rational with this and giving me time to respond.

1: Where did you say each exile? I found each episode, and if I recall correctly, this is still the same episode, no?

It does not say each Exile but this is a special case. When in a Double Exile I don't have specific rules laid out for it (perhaps I should have) but this is what I have done the last 3 times it happened. I wish I had posted again this requirement specifically however everybody else just posts conversations when they have them so it slipped my mind.


It does say in the penalty post however that:

If you fail to post at least two conversations you have with another player in a given Episode (each Episode lasts three or four days and includes an Imprisonment and an Exiling)

2: Would the votals alone have killed me?

If you mean would the penalties have killed you, yes. Not posting conversations for 3 times in 9 episodes would. The two conversations you posted as evidence of your activity are hardly convincing and lack substance at all.



I do appreciate the time you had to spend on this game and the fact that you did vote and complete activities is better than some. However, it is clear that you either were swamped with outside activities or never just got into the game - nearly everybody in the game said they rarely, if ever, talked with you. Perhaps this was just a bad time. You received a warning. You posted the bare minimum of conversations and I think you've told me 5 sentences in total of your thoughts. In the games I do that is highly abnormal. The only evidence I have that you engaged with other people is through what they told me and everyone has said you were majorly inactive the entire game. It has been 40 days... that's longer than any other game I've done and 6 times as long as an understandable period of inactivity.


You claimed you would participate more after the Critiques, and yet the last 4 days you didn't speak with anybody, you didn't vote, you didn't complete the interview, all of which you knew had deadlines. I have no reason to believe that had you known the conversation deadline was today you would have made it. You've had 40 days of chances to participate in the game. I am sorry it had to end for you at an inopportune time due to a misunderstanding but you had equal opportunity as everyone else had.


Thanks for your time,
Sam